[j-nsp] Any red flags on this MX240 configuration...

[Richard McGovern]

I could tell you what that knob is for, but I would need to kill you afterwards __

I believe that knob can be set to Enhanced IP even with older SCB.  I have a customer with this set, older SCB, no issues.

Just sat, this knob should always be set to Enhanced IP for best performance/etc.

I also agree with all the additional comments about RE/memory/64 bit support, etc.

FYI only, Rich

Richard McGovern
Sr Sales Engineer, Juniper Networks 
978-618-3342
 
I’d rather be lucky than good, as I know I am not good
I don’t make the news, I just report it
 

On 2/26/20, 9:59 AM, "Dave Bell" <me at geordish.org> wrote:

    The documentation states its supported:
    
    https://www.juniper.net/documentation/en_US/release-independent/junos/topics/concept/enhanced-mx-scb-description-mx960.html
    
    It doesn't support "Enhanced IP/Enhanced Ethernet mode" though
    whatever that is...
    
    Dave
    
    On Wed, 26 Feb 2020 at 14:37, Benjamin Collet <juniper-nsp at clt.tf> wrote:
    
    > On Wed, Feb 26, 2020 at 03:05:16PM +0100, Marcel Bößendörfer wrote:
    > > The MPC-3D-16XGE-SFPP even works with a 710-021523 / SCB-MX :-)
    >
    > On Wed, Feb 26, 2020 at 09:11:50AM -0500, Brendan Mannella wrote:
    > > We have MPC-3D-16XGE-SFPP and SCBE working in production. Haven’t noticed
    > > any issues.
    >
    > That's good to know. I wonder if there are any limitations whatsoever or
    > simply a mistake in the documentation and the Hardware Compatibility
    > Tool).
    >
    > --
    > Benjamin Collet
    > _______________________________________________
    > juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
    > https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp__;!!NEt6yMaO-gk!R46SRRs9euIxe0gY5atGljZf0afP3vCSl3lO7LYoLz1BRc3HoyDW97Plj-FP1M-fIw$ 
    >