[j-nsp] qfx5100, not possible to add a scheduler-map to an interface
Shamen Snyder
shamen.snyder at gmail.com
Thu Mar 26 09:43:24 EDT 2020
Most QFXs (and the EX4600) use ETS style CoS and scheduling.
Give this tech library document a read. I think it will answer your
questions.
https://www.juniper.net/documentation/en_US/junos/topics/example/cos-hierarchical-port-scheduling-ets-configuring.html
On Thu, Mar 26, 2020 at 3:50 AM niklas rehnberg <niklas.rehnberg at gmail.com>
wrote:
> Hi Experts,
> I have notis that it is not possible to add a scheduler-map to an
> interface.
> example: set class-of-service interfaces xe-0/0/0 scheduler-map test
>
> root at qfx5100# set class-of-service interfaces xe-0/0/0 ?
> Possible completions:
> + apply-groups Groups from which to inherit configuration data
> + apply-groups-except Don't inherit configuration data from these groups
> > classifiers Classifiers applied to incoming packets
> congestion-notification-profile Congestion notification profile for the
> interface
> > exclude-queue-overhead-bytes Exclude the overhead bytes from the queue
> statistics
> forwarding-class Forwarding class assigned to incoming packets
> > forwarding-class-set Map forwarding class sets to output traffic control
> profile
> > logical-interface-aggregate-statistics Logical interface aggregate queue
> statistics
> > rewrite-rules Rewrite rules applied to outgoing packets
> > unit Logical interface unit (or wildcard)
>
> So if I want change the bandwidth allocation, should I use the default
> scheduler-map?
>
> Example?
>
> Thanks Filmar
> _______________________________________________
> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
>
More information about the juniper-nsp
mailing list