[j-nsp] qfx5100, not possible to add a scheduler-map to an interface

Shamen Snyder shamen.snyder at gmail.com
Thu Mar 26 09:43:24 EDT 2020


Most QFXs (and the EX4600) use ETS style CoS and scheduling.

Give this tech library document a read. I think it will answer your
questions.

https://www.juniper.net/documentation/en_US/junos/topics/example/cos-hierarchical-port-scheduling-ets-configuring.html

On Thu, Mar 26, 2020 at 3:50 AM niklas rehnberg <niklas.rehnberg at gmail.com>
wrote:

> Hi Experts,
> I have notis that it is not possible to add a scheduler-map to an
> interface.
> example: set class-of-service interfaces xe-0/0/0 scheduler-map test
>
> root at qfx5100# set class-of-service interfaces xe-0/0/0 ?
> Possible completions:
> + apply-groups         Groups from which to inherit configuration data
> + apply-groups-except  Don't inherit configuration data from these groups
> > classifiers          Classifiers applied to incoming packets
>   congestion-notification-profile  Congestion notification profile for the
> interface
> > exclude-queue-overhead-bytes  Exclude the overhead bytes from the queue
> statistics
>   forwarding-class     Forwarding class assigned to incoming packets
> > forwarding-class-set  Map forwarding class sets to output traffic control
> profile
> > logical-interface-aggregate-statistics  Logical interface aggregate queue
> statistics
> > rewrite-rules        Rewrite rules applied to outgoing packets
> > unit                 Logical interface unit (or wildcard)
>
> So if I want change the bandwidth allocation, should I use the default
> scheduler-map?
>
> Example?
>
> Thanks Filmar
> _______________________________________________
> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
>


More information about the juniper-nsp mailing list