[j-nsp] QFX CRB

[Nitzan Tzelniker]

Looks ok to me
Which junos version you are running ? and which devices ?
Did you capture on the servers to see what is the traffic that causes the
high CPU utilization ?


On Tue, Nov 10, 2020 at 9:07 PM Cristian Cardoso <
cristian.cardoso11 at gmail.com> wrote:

> > show configuration protocols evpn
> vni-options {
>     vni 810 {
>         vrf-target target:888:888;
>     }
>     vni 815 {
>         vrf-target target:888:888;
>     }
>     vni 821 {
>         vrf-target target:888:888;
>     }
>     vni 822 {
>         vrf-target target:888:888;
>     }
>     vni 827 {
>         vrf-target target:888:888;
>     }
>     vni 830 {
>         vrf-target target:888:888;
>     }
>     vni 832 {
>         vrf-target target:888:888;
>     }
>     vni 910 {
>         vrf-target target:666:666;
>     }
>     vni 915 {
>         vrf-target target:666:666;
>     }
>     vni 921 {
>         vrf-target target:666:666;
>     }
>     vni 922 {
>         vrf-target target:666:666;
>     }
>     vni 927 {
>         vrf-target target:666:666;
>     }
>     vni 930 {
>         vrf-target target:666:666;
>     }
>     vni 932 {
>         vrf-target target:666:666;
>     }
>     vni 4018 {
>         vrf-target target:4018:4018;
>     }
> }
> encapsulation vxlan;
> default-gateway no-gateway-community;
> extended-vni-list all;
>
>
> An example of configuring the interfaces follows, all follow this
> pattern with more or less IP's.
> > show configuration interfaces irb.810
> proxy-macip-advertisement;
> virtual-gateway-accept-data;
> family inet {
>     mtu 9000;
>     address 10.19.11.253/22 {
>         preferred;
>         virtual-gateway-address 10.19.8.1;
>     }
> }
>
> Em ter., 10 de nov. de 2020 às 15:16, Nitzan Tzelniker
> <nitzan.tzelniker at gmail.com> escreveu:
> >
> > Can you show your irb and protocols evpn configuration please
> >
> > Nitzan
> >
> > On Tue, Nov 10, 2020 at 3:26 PM Cristian Cardoso <
> cristian.cardoso11 at gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> Does anyone use EVPN-VXLAN in the Centrally-Routed and Bridging
> topology?
> >> I have two spine switches and two leaf switches, when I use the
> >> virtual-gateway in active / active mode in the spines, the servers
> >> connected only in leaf1 have a large increase in IRQ's, generating
> >> higher CPU consumption in the servers.
> >> I did a test by deactivating spine2 and leaving only the gateway
> >> spine1, and the IRQ was zeroed out.
> >> Did anyone happen to go through this?
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
> >> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
>