[j-nsp] Big flows up to 320 Gbs

Roger Wiklund roger.wiklund at gmail.com
Sun Oct 4 14:14:51 EDT 2020


Hardware wise I would go with at least QFX5110-48S, then you have
4x1000Gbps uplinks, but even better go with QFX5120-48Y for 8x100G uplinks.
Also, don't use VC or MC-LAG unless you really must. Instead use EVPN-VXLAN
to provide multihoming, L2 stretch, Anycasted default GW etc etc.

Regards
Roger

On Sat, Sep 26, 2020 at 1:00 PM james list <jameslist72 at gmail.com> wrote:

> Dear experts
> I have a project to connect at layer2 level 16 servers (two interfaces
> each) with a total of 32 x 10Gbs server interfaces in order to setup a big
> data solution.
>
> These interfaces must have in normal conditions full L2 bandwidth available
> to transmit among themselves and redundancy of switch (if there is a fault
> condition 160 Gbs is enough).
>
> Since this kind of huge bandwidth requirement could cause bottlenecks in
> Datacenter Lan environment I was thinking to setup a separate lan
> architecture.
>
> I was thinking to setup a virtual chassis environment with 2 x qfx5100 with
> multiple 40 Gbs interfaces to set vc ports.
>
> Do you think it's a good architecture or what would you setup?
>
> Cheers
> James
> _______________________________________________
> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
>


More information about the juniper-nsp mailing list