[nsp-sec] seeking contacts: AS10297 and AS32392

[John Fraizer]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Jose,

Columbus NAP is going to be EE.NET.  Good luck finding clue there.  I have long since given up on that one.  The entire ColumbusNAP thing came after EE.NET lost all of
their transits for malware and/or non-payment.  They spun up "Columbus NAP" and then "resold" connectivity to themselves.  It caused me endless grief while I was operating
CMH-IX because too many people would confuse the REAL Columbus Exchange Point with the rogue ColumbusNAP.

John

Jose Nazario wrote:
> ----------- nsp-security Confidential --------
> 
> looking for tech contacts at these two ISPs if possible:
> 
> AS10297   | COLUMBUSNAP - The Columbus Network Access Point, Inc.
> AS32392   | OPENTRANSFER-ECOMMERCE - Ecommerce Corporation
> 
> both are located in the US.
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------------
> jose nazario, ph.d.     <jose at arbor.net>
> security researcher, office of the CTO,  arbor networks
> v: (734) 821 1427           http://asert.arbornetworks.com/
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> nsp-security mailing list
> nsp-security at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/nsp-security
> 
> Please do not Forward, CC, or BCC this E-mail outside of the nsp-security
> community. Confidentiality is essential for effective Internet security
> counter-measures.
> _______________________________________________

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with PCLinuxOS - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFI2UZQ+16lRpJszIgRAujOAJ9YYTfKry1TVZuS2S7O1q4XUw4VUwCfZZAa
Pyld2oqlRnxwSMcsNzLZGGo=
=cPFJ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----