[nsp-sec] Changes Coming

[Heather Schiller]

On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 6:33 PM, William Allen Simpson <
william.allen.simpson at gmail.com> wrote:

> ----------- nsp-security Confidential --------
>
>
> On 2/14/13 12:00 PM, Jon Lewis wrote:
>
>> I plan to leave Atlantic.net at the end of this month.  When I'm no
>> longer employed by Atlantic.net they won't have anyone on NSP-SEC, so they
>> were probably about to lose access to the reports anyway unless I kept
>> receiving them and forwarded the
>> information to whoever ends up being the appropriate contact.
>>
>> Not to threadjack, but there's also the question of my list membership.
>> Assuming my next job keeps me eligible for NSP-SEC, is there any need to
>> unsubscribe on the 27th just to re-subscribe on the 28th?
>>
>>  My position has long been: we vet the person, not the position.  The vet
> goes with you.  I was astonished that we revetted Heather Schiller....
>
>
Really, astonished that you revetted me, eh?  I will just have to work
harder to earn your trust..  ;-)



> It's one thing to leave the list because you're retiring from the
> security community.  But merely a change of employer/position?  Nonsense!
>
>
That was always my understanding of how *this* list worked.  Individuals
were vouched onto this list because of their operational role at their
employer and their trustworthiness, and letting the group decide that.  If
I became an accountant at Google Fiber or Accountants-R-Us instead of a
security engineer, or you already had a bunch of GFiber people, I would no
longer meet the requirements for the list.  It seems role first, then
person.. there are other places where the reverse seems to carry more
weight, person first then role.


>
>
>
> ______________________________**_________________
> nsp-security mailing list
> nsp-security at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/**mailman/listinfo/nsp-security<https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/nsp-security>
>
> Please do not Forward, CC, or BCC this E-mail outside of the nsp-security
> community. Confidentiality is essential for effective Internet security
> counter-measures.
> ______________________________**_________________
>