[Outages-discussion] Unsignificant outages (was:NYC - PINCH)

Jim Popovitch jimpop at gmail.com
Tue Sep 20 16:02:31 EDT 2016


On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 3:57 PM, Joseph Jackson
<jjackson at aninetworks.net> wrote:
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Outages-discussion [mailto:outages-discussion-bounces at outages.org] On Behalf Of Jim Popovitch
>> Sent: Tuesday, September 20, 2016 2:31 PM
>> To: outages-discussion at outages.org
>> Subject: [Outages-discussion] Unsignificant outages (was:NYC - PINCH)
>
>> In the same spirit, can some more guidance be issued to reduce the
>> noise of non-significant outages.   Is a single fiber cut really that
>> much of an impact in 2016, or is it really just a normal and expected event that routing was designed to deal with?
>
>> -Jim P.
>
>
>
> The routing protocols might be able to deal with a single fiber cut by design but I've noticed that networks are rarely designed topology and capacity wise for a failure of that sort.
>
> Example - Zayo had a fiber cut in between DFW and LA in 2014.  Sure traffic routed around it but the capacity of the links wasn't enough to handle the extra traffic during the outage which then caused issues across their entire network which would cause issues with their customers.
>
>
> So while the technology is more than able to go around damage human planners and most importantly costs keep it from being as robust and redundant as possible.
>

I understand that, but those that do plan/provide/purchase
connectivity/services from responsible providers, should their inboxes
be full of people complaining over trivial matters of ignored
experience and best practices?

-Jim P.


More information about the Outages-discussion mailing list