[Outages-discussion] Azure Outageks
Russell Zen
russellzen at outlook.com
Thu Sep 6 10:08:40 EDT 2018
"But what didnt help was that the resource manager to achieve that resiliency also fell over, and Azure AD Struggled with the loss of a major data centre and having to route around it."
Exactly. Post mortem for this between Azure account managers and their clients' CxO is going to be painful. From a value prop standpoint, and particularly from the client side of Azure I imagine there isn't just going to be questions like," how will you ensure this won't happen again" but also "why should I stay with your cloud when our contract expires?"
Get Outlook for Android<https://aka.ms/ghei36>
________________________________
From: Outages-discussion <outages-discussion-bounces at outages.org> on behalf of Seth Mattinen <sethm at rollernet.us>
Sent: Thursday, September 6, 2018 7:04:47 AM
To: outages-discussion at outages.org
Subject: Re: [Outages-discussion] Azure Outageks
On 9/5/18 7:26 PM, Matt Hoppes wrote:
> Yes, neither of those are acceptable explanation is for a data center of
> this size going off-line for 37 hours.
The size of a datacenter is not a metric for reliability. If anything,
the larger and more complex a systems is, the longer it will take to
restore.
_______________________________________________
Outages-discussion mailing list
Outages-discussion at outages.org
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/outages-discussion
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/outages-discussion/attachments/20180906/516bfb53/attachment.html>
More information about the Outages-discussion
mailing list