[Outages-discussion] Outages vs Outages-Discussion

[Charles Sprickman]

My thought on that is “oh well”.

I know mailing lists are old-fashioned and everyone else is in Slack or something, but if you can subscribe to one list, you can subscribe to two, and if -discussion is annoying, it can be filtered off in any mainstream mail client.

C

> On Dec 11, 2019, at 6:42 PM, Frank Bulk <frnkblk at iname.com> wrote:
> 
> The counter-argument to this was made that not everyone who is on outages in on outages-discussion, and so those posts would fail.
> 
> Frank 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Outages-discussion <outages-discussion-bounces at outages.org> On Behalf Of Jim Popovitch
> Sent: Wednesday, December 11, 2019 5:38 PM
> To: outages-discussion at outages.org
> Subject: Re: [Outages-discussion] Outages vs Outages-Discussion
> 
> I've been suggesting and recommending that for years, to no avail.
> 
> It's a very simple single change via the admin GUI which (apparently, why else?) no one has the admin password or confidence to do.
> 
> Hint: reply_to_address (general): Explicit Reply-To: header.
> 
> -Jim P.
> 
> On December 11, 2019 10:06:43 PM UTC, Grant Taylor <gtaylor at tnetconsulting.net> wrote:
>> Would it be worth while to re-configure the Outages mailing list to 
>> direct all replies to the Outages-Discussion mailing list?
>> 
>> That would mean that people would have to EXPLICITLY address their 
>> message to Outages.
>> 
>> Just my 2¢ on where messages belong.  (Read:  Configure the technology 
>> work for us.)
>> 
>> 
>> 
> _______________________________________________
> Outages-discussion mailing list
> Outages-discussion at outages.org
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/outages-discussion
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Outages-discussion mailing list
> Outages-discussion at outages.org
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/outages-discussion