[Outages-discussion] Outages vs Outages-Discussion

[Grant Taylor]

On 12/11/19 4:42 PM, Frank Bulk wrote:
> The counter-argument to this was made that not everyone who is on outages 
> in on outages-discussion, and so those posts would fail.

I think "failure" is a strong word.  Especially if posts from people not 
subscribed to outages-discussion were moderated and the moderators could 
allow the messages to go through.

There's also the ability to modify the footers that gets appended to 
outages stating that replies go to the outages-discussion list.

We have technical solutions.  The question is "do we want to use the 
technical solutions at our disposal or not".



-- 
Grant. . . .
unix || die

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 4013 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/outages-discussion/attachments/20191211/cfc12136/attachment-0001.p7s>