[rbak-nsp] subsriber port / card redundancy

[Marcin Kuczera]

Yuri Shefer wrote:
> You should check link-group configuration guide:
> 
> "In non-economical mode (the default), circuit information on active
> ports is replicated on all standby ports. After an active port fails,
> no packets are lost when the standby port becomes active."

[bgp1]R0_SE600(config)#port eth 1/4
[bgp1]R0_SE600(config-port)#link-group test
% Cannot group the port to link-group. Link-Group type and port encaps 
do not match
[bgp1]R0_SE600(config-port)#show config port 1/4
Building configuration...

Current configuration:
!
card 10ge-4-port 1
!
port ethernet 1/4
  no shutdown
!
end


[bgp1]R0_SE600(config-link-group)#show config link
Building configuration...

Current configuration:
!
!
link-group test access
  encapsulation dot1q
  dot1q pvc 100 encapsulation multi
   service clips dhcp context clips
   circuit protocol pppoe
    bind authentication chap maximum 2000
!


No other than "access" allows mi to behave as on physical port, to put 
subscribers clips + pppoe + others on it..

Any idea what's wrong ?

Regards,
Marcin



> 
> On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 12:28 PM, Marcin Kuczera <marcin at leon.pl> wrote:
>> hello,
>>
>> let's assume that I have SE600 with 2 4x10G cards.
>>
>> I would like to make i.e. port 1/3 to serve subscribers (pppoe/clips) and
>> port 2/3 is supposed to be "hot standby" port.
>> So in the case of failure, all subscribers will go via card 2 port 3.
>>
>> Is there such a possibility ? (I suppose that databases on both cards would
>> have to be synchronized in a meaning of subscribers).
>>
>> Both 1/3 and 2/3 will be connected to the same switch, same VLANs.
>>
>>
>> Maybe aggregated port aggregating 1/3 an 2/3 will do it ?
>>
>