[rbak-nsp] SE-400 replacement

[Scott Helms]

In more cases than not we're transitioning people away from PPPoX 
architectures to using pure DHCP.  So long as your DSLAMs will populate 
option-82 as part of the DHCP transaction AND can enforce that only an 
IP handed out by DHCP is allowed to bridge through you always know what 
shelf/slot/port an IP was on at a given time.

On 8/26/2011 2:33 PM, Marcin Kuczera wrote:
> Matthew S. Crocker wrote:
>>
>>  Is anyone else getting pressure from Ericcson to replace their 
>> SE-400s?   They are making noises that it is EoL already and will be 
>> soon EoS.  Trying to get me to upgrade to an SE-600.   I'm barely 
>> taxing my SE-400 as it is.
>>
>> Time to look at alternatives, but it seems the DSL/PPPoE/ATM 
>> aggregation router is a dying breed.
>
> I don't know if it is a pressure, but I have seen companies who have 
> SE600 as replacement for SE400.
>
> Ok, the most important issue is that if you have SE400 with XCRP3, you 
> will not be able to handle IPv6 subscribers.
> I think that in a perspecive of 1-2 years that's reasonable to go to 
> SE600.
>
> Regards,
> Marcin
> _______________________________________________
> redback-nsp mailing list
> redback-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/redback-nsp
>


-- 
Scott Helms
Vice President of Technology
ISP Alliance, Inc. DBA ZCorum
(678) 507-5000
--------------------------------
http://twitter.com/kscotthelms
--------------------------------