[rbak-nsp] today's BGP issue...
Marcin Kuczera
marcin at leon.pl
Fri Dec 2 08:13:05 EST 2011
Voigt, Thomas wrote:
> Hi Olivier and Marcin,
>
> Olivier Benghozi wrote:
>
>> What about asking an upstream provider to accept incoming ORF?
>> While it doesn't prevent the session to flap, it allows you
>> to put a filter on your side (once you decode your show bgp
>> malformed update result) that would be automatically applied
>> by your provider towards you.
>
> This could be a workaround. I'll ask our upstream providers if they can do this.
>
> But it's nothing more than a workaround:
> We have to wait until someone sends this malformed updates again and have than to react on it.
>
> @Marcin:
> 1. Downgrade is not an option here. We need some of the features in the 6.4 train
Ok, I understand.
> 2. We don't use communities here. What effect does it have if our upstreams are clearing that?
If you don't care about communities - it doesn't bother you.
> 3. We are multi homed and have BGP-Peerings with customers of us. So I think it's also no option to get only the default route from the upstream. As a workaround this could also work.
For peerings or DECIX/LINX/WhateverIX it shouldn't be a problem, so you
will have it still with highest localpref in routing table.
Regards,
Marcin
More information about the redback-nsp
mailing list