[scg-sec] Proposed new members for SBC
Wendy Garvin
wgarvin at cisco.com
Mon Aug 30 15:53:54 EDT 2004
Don,
Thanks for the vote of confidence. I'll make sure that if there are any
changes on the Cisco side, they're communicated well in advance and you guys
have good people to replace me. There are a lot of very good people in my
team, so I guarantee you'll have good representation from the Cisco side no
matter what happens.
-Wendy
> Smith, Donald <Donald.Smith at qwest.com> [2004-08-30 12:43] wrote:
> Wendy I have NO issues with someone that was vetted to the nsp-security
> group staying on scg-sec.
> The issue I have is we often discuss some elements of the nsp-security
> emails within this email group AND as I understand it that would violate
> the nsp charter if we don't all stay members.
>
> I belive it would be a disservice to (nsp-sec and scg-sec groups) to
> remove you or Sean from the nsp-security list because of the trust you
> have EARNED!
>
> Donald.Smith at qwest.com GCIA
> pgpFingerPrint:9CE4 227B B9B3 601F B500 D076 43F1 0767 AF00 EDCC
> Give a man a fish feed em for a day. Teach em to phish and feed em till
> people quit falling for phishing attempts.
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Wendy Garvin [mailto:wgarvin at cisco.com]
> > Sent: Monday, August 30, 2004 1:31 PM
> > To: Smith, Donald
> > Cc: Wendy Garvin; Sean Donelan; scg-sec at puck.nether.net
> > Subject: Re: [scg-sec] Proposed new members for SBC
> >
> >
> > > Wendy/Barry/Jared I am not certain what the requirements are but
> > > originally all members of the scg group were also members of the
> > > nsp-security group AND had been vetted. I am assuming that
> > is still the
> > > requirement. If not then discussing nsp-security issues here would
> > > violate the nsp-security charter.
> >
> > All the Cisco folks here are currently nsp-sec members,
> > however, that's
> > going to change. Cisco is going to have to remove some people
> > from nsp-sec
> > due to the new rules, and if I'm not one of 'em this time,
> > then in 6 months,
> > I'll have to rotate off and give someone else a shot at it.
> > That's necessary
> > for continued growth of other team members on PSIRT, I won't
> > be doing this
> > job forever (as you all know, it's a bit of a burnout
> > position) and we need
> > to continue to let those folks build relationships.
> >
> > If you aren't happy about this side-effect of the new nsp-sec
> > rules, please
> > let the nsp-sec moderators know. I know that this group is
> > one of the groups
> > that is worried about the growing lurker membership on
> > nsp-sec, so I'm cool
> > with whichever way things go. If I am removed from nsp-sec,
> > it'll be you
> > guy's call whether or not to pull me off of here at that point. You'll
> > always still be able to call me if you need something.
> >
> > -Wendy
> >
>
>
> [ ----- End of Included Message ----- ]
--
Wendy Garvin - Cisco PSIRT - 408 525-1888 CCIE# 6526
----------------------------------------------------
http://www.cisco.com/go/psirt
More information about the scg-sec
mailing list