[scg-sec] Proposed new members for SBC

[Smith, Donald]

Wendy I have NO issues with someone that was vetted to the nsp-security
group staying on scg-sec.
The issue I have is we often discuss some elements of the nsp-security
emails within this email group AND as I understand it that would violate
the nsp charter if we don't all stay members.

I belive it would be a disservice to (nsp-sec and scg-sec groups) to
remove you or Sean from the nsp-security list because of the trust you
have EARNED!

Donald.Smith at qwest.com GCIA
pgpFingerPrint:9CE4 227B B9B3 601F B500  D076 43F1 0767 AF00 EDCC
Give a man a fish feed em for a day. Teach em to phish and feed em till
people quit falling for phishing attempts. 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Wendy Garvin [mailto:wgarvin at cisco.com] 
> Sent: Monday, August 30, 2004 1:31 PM
> To: Smith, Donald
> Cc: Wendy Garvin; Sean Donelan; scg-sec at puck.nether.net
> Subject: Re: [scg-sec] Proposed new members for SBC
> 
> 
> > Wendy/Barry/Jared I am not certain what the requirements are but
> > originally all members of the scg group were also members of the
> > nsp-security group AND had been vetted. I am assuming that 
> is still the
> > requirement. If not then discussing nsp-security issues here would
> > violate the nsp-security charter.
> 
> All the Cisco folks here are currently nsp-sec members, 
> however, that's
> going to change. Cisco is going to have to remove some people 
> from nsp-sec
> due to the new rules, and if I'm not one of 'em this time, 
> then in 6 months,
> I'll have to rotate off and give someone else a shot at it. 
> That's necessary
> for continued growth of other team members on PSIRT, I won't 
> be doing this
> job forever (as you all know, it's a bit of a burnout 
> position) and we need
> to continue to let those folks build relationships.
> 
> If you aren't happy about this side-effect of the new nsp-sec 
> rules, please
> let the nsp-sec moderators know. I know that this group is 
> one of the groups
> that is worried about the growing lurker membership on 
> nsp-sec, so I'm cool
> with whichever way things go. If I am removed from nsp-sec, 
> it'll be you
> guy's call whether or not to pull me off of here at that point. You'll
> always still be able to call me if you need something.
> 
> -Wendy
>