[VoiceOps] 811 locate service

[Paul Timmins]

I would assume if you have to ask the question, the customer will have 
the expectation that it will work, and I'd imagine you'd want the 
customer to have the perception this is a quality service that meets or 
exceeds the specs of the product they're replacing (probably POTS), and 
thus you wouldn't want a feature gap, even if you didn't see 811 as a 
"feature" per se.



David Hiers wrote:
> No good reason not to support it; its just that legal/regulatory
> requirements go into the priority queue of the project plan.
>
> David
>
>
>
> On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 8:11 AM, Paul Timmins<paul at timmins.net> wrote:
>   
>> Even if you're not required to, why wouldn't you? The infrastructure you
>> save may be your own or something you depend on.
>>
>> David Hiers wrote:
>>     
>>> The recent backhoe-fade issue brings up an interesting topic:
>>>
>>> As VOIP networks, are we legally required to provide 811 services?
>>>
>>> I"m pretty sure that we're exempt, want to kick it around with the
>>> group for a consensus view....
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> David
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> VoiceOps mailing list
>>> VoiceOps at voiceops.org
>>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops
>>>
>>>
>>>       
>>     
>
>