[VoiceOps] Question about Packet Jitter
Schwarz, Albrecht (Albrecht)
albrecht.schwarz at alcatel-lucent.com
Tue Nov 2 04:32:23 EDT 2010
That's of course not really true, looks like you missed a lot of ITU-T docs.
You got to check out the
of ITU-T Recommendations.
At also the work in progress of SG12:
P.1010 : Fundamental voice transmission objectives for VoIP terminals and gateways
P.VOIP-MM Q 2/12 Measurement methodologies for P.VOIP
P.IPterm Q 3/12 Transmission characteristics for VoIP terminals
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Hiers, David [mailto:David_Hiers at adp.com]
> Sent: Montag, 1. November 2010 21:54
> To: Jim.Dalton at transnexus.com; Schwarz, Albrecht (Albrecht);
> voiceops at voiceops.org
> Subject: RE: [VoiceOps] Question about Packet Jitter
> Before you get down into the weeds with the math...
> All the ITU docs that I've read portray the "network" as set
> of "non-rtp-aware, forward-as-fast-as-you-can
> router-type-things that probably have some qos capability".
> The "edge" is implicitly defined as the first occurrence of a
> jitter buffer.
> As near as I can tell, there are no rtp jitter buffers in an
> ITU "network" for which all this fancy math applies. If you
> transcode, scrub media with a ditech pvp, or otherwise
> implement anything that knows it should generate an rtp
> stream by sending a packet every X milliseconds, the ITU math
> is bounded by that device.
> If the SBC in your example transcodes or has a
> jitter/loss-concealment buffer, it *is* the edge, and you
> cannot average the link jitters as described in the ITU docs.
> David Hiers
> CCIE (R/S, V), CISSP
> ADP Dealer Services
> 2525 SW 1st Ave.
> Suite 300W
> Portland, OR 97201
> o: 503-205-4467
> f: 503-402-3277
> -----Original Message-----
> From: voiceops-bounces at voiceops.org
> [mailto:voiceops-bounces at voiceops.org] On Behalf Of Jim Dalton
> Sent: Friday, October 29, 2010 6:43 AM
> To: 'Schwarz, Albrecht (Albrecht)'; voiceops at voiceops.org
> Subject: Re: [VoiceOps] Question about Packet Jitter
> > VoIP performance experts should be familiar with
> > - ITU-T Y.1541 concerning IPDV (IP packet delay variation =
> > there are many sections on IPDV, particularily also on "aggregated
> > PDV";
> [JD wrote:] ITU-T Y.1541 "Amendment 1: New Appendix X - An
> example showing how to calculate IPDV across multiple
> sections" addresses my question.
> Thank you,
> Jim D.
> VoiceOps mailing list
> VoiceOps at voiceops.org
> This message and any attachments are intended only for the
> use of the addressee and may contain information that is
> privileged and confidential. If the reader of the message is
> not the intended recipient or an authorized representative of
> the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any
> dissemination of this communication is strictly prohibited.
> If you have received this communication in error, please
> notify us immediately by e-mail and delete the message and
> any attachments from your system.
More information about the VoiceOps