[VoiceOps] Difficulties sending calls to Magic Jack
Matt Yaklin
myaklin at g4.net
Wed Nov 17 14:55:32 EST 2010
My uneducated guess is that the message is being played by Magic Jack.
Some carriers must be messing with the info they are sending
MJ for their call data records or somehow dumping calls via creative
routing?
MJ must count on the income from terminating calls to offset all
the outgoing calls? If it was enough incoming calls that were messed
with it could really upset things for them?
Like I said.. just a guess.
m
On Wed, 17 Nov 2010, J. Oquendo wrote:
> On 11/17/2010 2:13 PM, anorexicpoodle wrote:
> We are seeing this as well.
>
> On Wed, 2010-11-17 at 10:53 -0800, Nicholas Sten wrote:
> Anyone else have insight or comments on this fiasco?
>
> http://www.examiner.com/christianity-culture-in-san-diego/is-magicjack-highjacking-your-calls-with-confusing-305-848-828
> 8-recording
>
>
> <marketing_shpeel>
>
> ... business you are trying to reach is using magicJack.
>
> </marketing_shpeel>
>
> And if a business is relying on Magic Jack (long pause...) You get what you pay for!
>
> *ducks*
>
> --
>
> =+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+
> J. Oquendo
> SGFA, SGFE, C|EH, CNDA, CHFI, OSCP, CPT
>
> "It takes 20 years to build a reputation and five minutes to
> ruin it. If you think about that, you'll do things
> differently." - Warren Buffett
>
> 227C 5D35 7DCB 0893 95AA 4771 1DCE 1FD1 5CCD 6B5E
> http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x5CCD6B5E
>
>
More information about the VoiceOps
mailing list