[VoiceOps] CALEA for the small fry operator

[Joshua Goldbard]

Name one thing that's standard in telecom. People still run x.25, frame relay and AS400's.

All kidding aside, we've heard a few different ways of doing this, but is there anyone on this list who as been sued or fined as a result of CALEA non-compliance?

Curious,
Joshua

Sent from my iPad

On Jan 19, 2013, at 10:25 PM, "Nathan Anderson" <nathana at fsr.com> wrote:

> You're probably right, but I'm just laying out the facts as I see/read them.  The rules seem to state that you aren't granted "safe harbor" unless you adhere to standard industry-adopted protocols.
> 
> -- Nathan 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: voiceops-bounces at voiceops.org [mailto:voiceops-bounces at voiceops.org] On Behalf Of Alex Balashov
> Sent: Saturday, January 19, 2013 5:16 PM
> To: voiceops at voiceops.org
> Subject: Re: [VoiceOps] CALEA for the small fry operator
> 
> On 01/19/2013 07:57 PM, Nathan Anderson wrote:
> 
>> It is sounding more and more like we are either expected to adhere to
>> these industry standards or are going to be expected to at some
>> point, depending on what the DoJ has actually filed in response to
>> these standards and how section 107(b) of the CALEA of 1994 is to be
>> interpreted.
> 
> Practically speaking, this is impossible, and will continue to be 
> impossible.
> 
> It's just too expensive.
> 
> -- 
> Alex Balashov - Principal
> Evariste Systems LLC
> 235 E Ponce de Leon Ave
> Suite 106
> Decatur, GA 30030
> United States
> Tel: +1-678-954-0670
> Web: http://www.evaristesys.com/, http://www.alexbalashov.com/
> _______________________________________________
> VoiceOps mailing list
> VoiceOps at voiceops.org
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops
> _______________________________________________
> VoiceOps mailing list
> VoiceOps at voiceops.org
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops