[VoiceOps] Issues with the "new" SPA1x2 models

[Max Mühlbronner]

Hi,


we also experienced problems with customers using SPA-112 (to be exact: 
Cisco/SPA112-1.2.1(004)-rc) behaviour seemed to be different than 
similar Linksys fw/devices.

One of the issues was Registration/Min expires handling (server sends 
minimum expires in contact header parameter which the ata seems to 
ignore) but i was not able to verify this myself (no equipment for 
testing) and i can not take the customers word for it...


Best Regards

Max M.

On 01/23/2013 10:36 PM, Chris Wallace wrote:
> Make sure you're using firmware version 1.3.1-003. The previous 
> version v1.2.1-004 has major stability issues, memory leaks and SNMP 
> issues. It crashes after a few days and requires a hard reboot to be 
> restored.
>
> ---Chris
>
> On Jan 17, 2013, at 5:15 PM, Robert Dawson <RDawson at alliedtelecom.net 
> <mailto:RDawson at alliedtelecom.net>> wrote:
>
>> Everything from 1.0.1 to 1.3.1.
>> *From:*Jastak, Eric [mailto:Eric.Jastak at adp.com <http://adp.com>]
>> *Sent:*Thursday, January 17, 2013 2:06 PM
>> *To:*Robert Dawson; voiceops at voiceops.org <mailto:voiceops at voiceops.org>
>> *Subject:*RE: Issues with the "new" SPA1x2 models
>> Haven't see that with ours.  What version of code did you deploy with 
>> the SPA1x2's?
>> *From:*Robert Dawson[mailto:RDawson at alliedtelecom.net] 
>> <mailto:[mailto:RDawson at alliedtelecom.net]>
>> *Sent:*Thursday, January 17, 2013 2:04 PM
>> *To:*Jastak, Eric (DS);voiceops at voiceops.org 
>> <mailto:voiceops at voiceops.org>
>> *Subject:*Re: Issues with the "new" SPA1x2 models
>> Locking up randomly, mostly. Web portal will be responsive but a port 
>> will show offhook when it is not and incoming calls to both lines get 
>> rejected or both lines will fail to register. Sometimes the web 
>> portal becomes non-responsive. I'll be opening a ticket with Cisco -- 
>> just wanted to see if anyone had possibly been through this yet.
>> *From:*<Jastak>, Eric <Eric.Jastak at adp.com <mailto:Eric.Jastak at adp.com>>
>> *Date:*Thursday, January 17, 2013 5:00 PM
>> *To:*Robert Dawson <rdawson at alliedtelecom.net 
>> <mailto:rdawson at alliedtelecom.net>>, "voiceops at voiceops.org 
>> <mailto:voiceops at voiceops.org>" <voiceops at voiceops.org 
>> <mailto:voiceops at voiceops.org>>
>> *Subject:*RE: Issues with the "new" SPA1x2 models
>> We just started deploying the SPA 112s recently.  Have had any 
>> reported issues, but we don't have a ton out there yet.  What kind of 
>> problems are you having?
>> *From:*voiceops-bounces at voiceops.org 
>> <mailto:voiceops-bounces at voiceops.org>[mailto:voiceops-bounces at voiceops.org]*On 
>> Behalf Of*Robert Dawson
>> *Sent:*Thursday, January 17, 2013 12:28 PM
>> *To:*voiceops at voiceops.org <mailto:voiceops at voiceops.org>
>> *Subject:*[VoiceOps] Issues with the "new" SPA1x2 models
>> Anyone having good luck with these? Anyone with a substantial number 
>> deployed. They seem to be very flaky . . . just want to see if that 
>> experience is unique.
>> <image001.png>
>> 	
>> *Robert Dawson*
>> */Voice Systems Engineer/*
>> (o) 202-349-0477 | (f) 202-541-9050
>> rdawson at alliedtelecom.net 
>> <mailto:rdawson at alliedtelecom.net>|www.alliedtelecom.net 
>> <http://www.alliedtelecom.net/>
>> follow us: <image002.png>facebook 
>> <http://www.facebook.com/alliedtelecom> |<image003.png> LinkedIn 
>> <http://www.linkedin.com/company/allied-telecom-group> |<image004.png> twitter 
>> <http://twitter.com/#%21/allied_telecom>
>> 1120 20th Street, NW, Suite 500-South, Washington, DC 20036
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>>
>>           This message and any attachments are intended only for the
>>           use of the addressee and may contain information that is
>>           privileged and confidential. If the reader of the message
>>           is not the intended recipient or an authorized
>>           representative of the intended recipient, you are hereby
>>           notified that any dissemination of this communication is
>>           strictly prohibited. If you have received this
>>           communication in error, please notify us immediately by
>>           e-mail and delete the message and any attachments from your
>>           system.
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>>
>>           This message and any attachments are intended only for the
>>           use of the addressee and may contain information that is
>>           privileged and confidential. If the reader of the message
>>           is not the intended recipient or an authorized
>>           representative of the intended recipient, you are hereby
>>           notified that any dissemination of this communication is
>>           strictly prohibited. If you have received this
>>           communication in error, please notify us immediately by
>>           e-mail and delete the message and any attachments from your
>>           system.
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> VoiceOps mailing list
>> VoiceOps at voiceops.org <mailto:VoiceOps at voiceops.org>
>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> VoiceOps mailing list
> VoiceOps at voiceops.org
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/voiceops/attachments/20130124/54af4b15/attachment-0001.html>