[VoiceOps] Hardware transcoding solutions?
Colton Conor
colton.conor at gmail.com
Fri Aug 28 07:51:01 EDT 2015
I would say whatever solution you pick, make sure it is able to transcode
OPUS. That would be a requirement for me.
On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 4:41 PM, Simon Perreault <sperreault at jive.com>
wrote:
> Le 2015-08-27 17:38, Alex Balashov a écrit :
> > On 08/27/2015 05:35 PM, Simon Perreault wrote:
> >
> >> I just pointed out that software*can* do 5k calls in one 1U generic
> >> server
> >
> > 5K of transcoded calls, with a growth path?
>
> Sure, the growth path is Moore's law. Just buy more and bigger servers.
> That's the beauty of software.
>
> > Admittedly, it's based on anecdata rather than an enquiry of any
> > scientific rigour, but my experiences with Freeswitch point to results
> > closer to those of Moises Silva. It seems that it can do 1000-2000
> > transcoded channels on a commodity multi-core box without a problem.
> > However, it's been a few years, so it's possible that the density is
> > greater today, and/or that Freeswitch can fully and efficiently utilise
> > more and faster cores nowadays to achieve 4000-5000.
>
> I honestly have no idea of FreeSWITCH's performance so can't talk about it.
>
> :)
>
> Simon
> _______________________________________________
> VoiceOps mailing list
> VoiceOps at voiceops.org
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/voiceops/attachments/20150828/084b16c8/attachment.html>
More information about the VoiceOps
mailing list