[VoiceOps] Future of the Traditional PSTN vs VOIP and VoLTE
paul at timmins.net
Sat Dec 5 16:50:24 EST 2015
I happen to have been putting my money where my mouth is in stern agreement with you for the last decade. I guess it's not a terrible time to ask if telcodata.us is lacking information others wish I'd dig up and provide? I've been wanting to get deeper into references and training videos, but indexing information is kind of an obsession of mine.
> On Dec 5, 2015, at 14:45, Erik Flournoy <erik at eespro.com> wrote:
> Paul ---- So Agreed. Voice in the US is a roadmap with profits created for the author to continually profit.
> I totally believe in standards, heck structure are built around building codes, but when the information is all centrally controlled and not freely available to the masses isn't it essentially another big BELL company?
> On Sat, Dec 5, 2015 at 11:41 AM, Paul Timmins <paul at timmins.net <mailto:paul at timmins.net>> wrote:
> I can only point out what I pointed out in the FCC comment period - iconnectiv already charges both sides for the LERG, which it solely maintains with an iron grip. It maintains many if not practically all of the standards documents, and now we're proposing (well, too late for future tense) to let them have control over number portability now.
> The LERG update system and all of its screens, and all the goofy identifiers each held behind their own paywalls and gatekeepers - nothing about it looks to be modernizing any time soon. If you're hoping for forward looking ideas out of this company, you're not going to find them. They have entrenched interest in maintaining the status quo.
> I'd love for it to be different, but I see this only as more consolidation around the dinosaurs that created this convoluted market to begin with.
>> On Dec 5, 2015, at 14:17, Erik Flournoy <erik at eespro.com <mailto:erik at eespro.com>> wrote:
>> Aloha Group,
>> I'm curious to know others thoughts on where they believe the traditional PSTN is going vs VOIP and VoLTE. Now that Iconnectiv will be administering the LNP in the US I feel as though it's the best time to try and propose new or more up to date solutions that allow smaller carriers to operate.
>> For example there is no charge to have the ability to port numbers in NPAC, but there is a monthly charge for the remote access to the NPAC. Then the interconnectivity at the LEC level. The archaic ways of telecom have not seemed to change much although VOIP is now in my opinion the standard of telecom. VOIP will soon be able to get code blocks and route via SIP vs SS7 and LERG. LERG, ASR/LSR, SS7 all systems owned by one monopolizing company.
>> Erik F.
>> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
>> This e-mail message, including any attachments from EESPRO.com <http://eespro.com/> - contain information which is CONFIDENTIAL AND/OR LEGALLY PRIVILEGED. The information is intended only for the use of the individual named above and may not be disseminated to any other party without written permission. If you are not the intended recipient, or the employee or agent responsible for delivering the message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, disclosure, distribution, copying or taking of any action in reliance on the contents of this e-mailed information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error, please immediately notify info at eespro.com <mailto:info at eespro.com>, and permanently delete this e-mail and the attachments hereto, if any, and destroy any printout thereof.
>> VoiceOps mailing list
>> VoiceOps at voiceops.org <mailto:VoiceOps at voiceops.org>
>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops <https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 204 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
More information about the VoiceOps