[VoiceOps] Homer vs VoIPMonitor
colton.conor at gmail.com
Mon Nov 23 08:35:50 EST 2015
So based on everything I am getting from this thread, VoIPMonitor seems to
be the way to go. I have not heard too much about homer.
We are evaluating wholesale hosted PBX providers. One has VoIPMonitor
integrated into their platform, and the other has Homer built into their
platform. Trying to understand if I am at a disadvantage going with the
platform that includes homer.
On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 10:02 AM, Kidd Filby <kiddfilby at gmail.com> wrote:
> I have had experience with Empirix, Palladian and VoIPMonitor. Both
> Empirix and Palladian are EXPENSIVE and very hard to Engineer correctly to
> capture all the messaging. An under-engineered system will be VERY
> annoying and a HUGE waste of money. VoIPMonitor has been extremely
> valuable, very easy to use, simple to integrate, cost effective and plain
> old accurate. For the options available today, I wouldn't go with anything
> other than VoIPMonitor.
> On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 6:46 AM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla <
> miconda at gmail.com> wrote:
>> On 20/11/15 14:22, Colton Conor wrote:
>> > I believe you are correct that Homer only does SIP, where VoIPMonitor
>> > does both.
>> The latest version of homer capture agent can track rtcp:
>> Daniel-Constantin Mierla
>> http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
>> Book: SIP Routing With Kamailio - http://www.asipto.com
>> Kamailio Advanced Training, Nov 30-Dec 2, Berlin - http://asipto.com/kat
>> VoiceOps mailing list
>> VoiceOps at voiceops.org
> Kidd Filby
> 661.557.5640 (C)
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the VoiceOps