[VoiceOps] Instant Porting

[Paul Timmins]

A lot of it also comes down to cellular portability being required by the FCC to process ports in 4 hours or less from the day it was started as well. The FCC saw how wireline worked and said they weren't going to have that on wireless. Shortly after they cleaned up wireline (it used to be much worse!), and then introduced rules for intermodal ports.

On Feb 9, 2016 20:43, Carlos Alcantar <carlos at race.com> wrote:
>
>
> A lot of it goes into literally 4 companies working together to have automation.  I don't know that process would scale if it was hundreds of companies trying to accomplish the same thing without a clearinghouse in the middle and everyone talking the same language. 
>
> ​ 
> Carlos Alcantar 
> Race Communications / Race Team Member 
> 1325 Howard Ave. #604, Burlingame, CA. 94010 
> Phone: +1 415 376 3314 / carlos at race.com / http://www.race.com 
>
>
> ________________________________________ 
> From: VoiceOps <voiceops-bounces at voiceops.org> on behalf of Alex Balashov <abalashov at evaristesys.com> 
> Sent: Tuesday, February 9, 2016 3:02 PM 
> To: Alexander Lopez; voiceops at voiceops.org 
> Subject: Re: [VoiceOps] Instant Porting 
>
> One would think that the incentives would diverge depending on whether 
> the given wireless operator expects to be a net beneficiary of porting 
> in or a net loser to porting out -- a function of their market position, 
> which is not equal. 
>
> -- 
> Alex Balashov | Principal | Evariste Systems LLC 
> 303 Perimeter Center North, Suite 300 
> Atlanta, GA 30346 
> United States 
>
> Tel: +1-800-250-5920 (toll-free) / +1-678-954-0671 (direct) 
> Web: http://www.evaristesys.com/, http://www.csrpswitch.com/ 
> _______________________________________________ 
> VoiceOps mailing list 
> VoiceOps at voiceops.org 
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops 
>
> _______________________________________________
> VoiceOps mailing list
> VoiceOps at voiceops.org
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops