[VoiceOps] TCP Signaling for SIP Signaling

[Alex Balashov]

Are low re-registration intervals and flurries of OPTIONS pings and/or CRLF keepalives over UDP better for mobile batteries? :-)

-- Alex

> On Jul 17, 2017, at 5:12 PM, jungle Boogie <jungleboogie0 at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> On 16 July 2017 at 19:28, Colton Conor <colton.conor at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Overall TCP just always
>> seems to work, and UPD depends on the situation of the network. TCP is
>> better for battery consumption on mobile sip applications as well.
>> 
> 
> Knowing that TCP uses more overhead just by being TCP, is it really
> better for mobile phone batteries?
> 
> -- 
> -------
> inum: 883510009027723
> sip: jungleboogie at sip2sip.info
> _______________________________________________
> VoiceOps mailing list
> VoiceOps at voiceops.org
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops