[VoiceOps] Bandwidth East Coast Issues

[Mike Hammett]

That announcement by VoIP.ms predates the bandwidth.com resolution. 



Also, why wouldn't VoIP.MS (or rather, their host webhosting companies) have PNIs with bandwidth.com? Oh, well, maybe because like many other VoIP providers, their IP network sucks. Few POPs, no IXes, a technical activity (BGP peering) requires a trip to the account team, etc. 


https://peeringdb.com/net/1835 


https://radar.qrator.net/as12130/peerings#startDate=2021-06-26&endDate=2021-09-26&tab=current 




----- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 
http://www.ics-il.com 



Midwest Internet Exchange 
http://www.midwest-ix.com 



----- Original Message -----

From: "Pete Mundy via VoiceOps" <voiceops at voiceops.org> 
To: "VoiceOps" <voiceops at voiceops.org> 
Sent: Sunday, September 26, 2021 1:47:18 AM 
Subject: Re: [VoiceOps] Bandwidth East Coast Issues 


Not sure if Slashdot does... 

https://tech.slashdot.org/story/21/09/26/0014216/voipms-battles-week-long-sustained-ddos-for-ransom-attack 


> On 26/09/2021, at 12:47 PM, Peter Beckman via VoiceOps <voiceops at voiceops.org> wrote: 
> 
> BW Considers the incident resolved. 

_______________________________________________ 
VoiceOps mailing list 
VoiceOps at voiceops.org 
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/voiceops/attachments/20210926/fdb9c301/attachment.htm>