[VoiceOps] [EXTERNAL] Identity Header Test Tool

Dovid Bender dovid at telecurve.com
Tue Jul 5 12:34:23 EDT 2022


It seems that BandWidth is currently signing all calls from their customer
where the DID is not with BandWidth as B.


On Tue, Jul 5, 2022 at 12:31 PM Zilk, David <David.Zilk at cdk.com> wrote:

> I am getting results from a test to the Bandwidth number that are
> confusing. It appears that our Identity header is not making it through to
> them, however the call does have an Identity header, certified by Bandwith,
> with B attestation. This is odd as we don't have any direct business
> relationship with Bandwidth. How can they claim B attestation?
>
> David Zilk
> CDK Global/IP Networked Services
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: VoiceOps <voiceops-bounces at voiceops.org> On Behalf Of David Frankel
> Sent: Sunday, July 3, 2022 8:05 AM
> To: voiceops at voiceops.org
> Subject: [EXTERNAL] [VoiceOps] Identity Header Test Tool
>
> CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the CDK organization.
> Exercise caution when clicking links or opening attachments, especially
> from unknown senders.
>
> Last week I was forwarded a note from this list regarding tools to test
> and debug SHAKEN Identity headers. That prompted us to stitch together some
> modules we already had in an attempt to help.
>
> What we have is at http://identity.legalcallsonly.org. You can call one
> of the test numbers listed on that page, and if we receive your header,
> we'll read you a six-digit code. Disconnect and then plug the code into the
> box on the web form, and we'll show you details of that Identity header.
>
> Perhaps most importantly, you'll be able to see if the header we received
> is the one you sent. In addition, we parse the header and try to tell you
> if it is correctly formatted and valid.
>
> Currently we have a couple of geographic DIDs and three toll-free numbers
> (each using different underlying providers). So far we aren't having a lot
> of success getting the Identity headers on the TFNs; we're working to
> improve that.
>
> Suggestions welcome. We hope the tool provokes more discussion about best
> practices regarding making the Authentication Framework as functional and
> useful as possible.
>
> Happy 4th of July!
>
> David Frankel
> ZipDX LLC
> St. George, UT USA
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> VoiceOps mailing list
> VoiceOps at voiceops.org
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops
> _______________________________________________
> VoiceOps mailing list
> VoiceOps at voiceops.org
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/voiceops/attachments/20220705/3a9e888a/attachment.htm>


More information about the VoiceOps mailing list