[VoiceOps] Fax

[Jawaid Bazyar]

What are everyone's thoughts on trying to do fax this way, versus, an E-Fax
solution that supports receiving as well as sending ?

How many legit physical fax machines are you all supporting out there?

Jawaid


On Fri, Apr 19, 2024 at 12:13 PM Mark Wiater via VoiceOps <
voiceops at voiceops.org> wrote:

> I can echo, that the ATA matters. But so does the configuration of the
> faxing device (14400 Baud and ECM on), the switches that the calls go
> through, the configuation of the network equipment and the quality of the
> internet connection, even the cable type connecting the ATA and the fax
> device sometimes.
>
> I have excellent faxing history with Cisco ATA-191's using G.711 (but not
> T.38 with the softswitch I use predominantly) and a client network with
> well configured QOS enabled firewalls.
>
> It's not logical to me, but I've even seen instances where using a 2
> conductor cable from fax to ata improved communication over a 4 conductor
> cable.
>
> Nathan and Ross covered other great points as well.
>
> Mark
>
> On 4/18/2024 10:22 PM, KARIM MEKKAOUI via VoiceOps wrote:
>
> Hi VOIPOPS Community
>
>
>
> Do you know about any fax over internet solution that works? We tried
> multiple ATA and multiple ATA configurations, sometime it works sometimes
> not.
>
>
>
> Also, do you know about any eFax solution provider that works good.
>
>
>
> Thanks in advance for your help.
>
>
>
> KARIM
>
> MEKTEL INC.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> VoiceOps mailing listVoiceOps at voiceops.orghttps://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> VoiceOps mailing list
> VoiceOps at voiceops.org
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/voiceops/attachments/20240419/854071df/attachment.htm>