On Tuesday, March 5, 2002, at 10:24 , avri wrote:
> does the absence of statement about requiring host mobility
> indicate that this is not something the architecture should be required
> to support?
Stating it that way would drive a particular engineering
approach to it. Put another way, "host mobility" is a
special case of "network mobility" and it is best to
focus on the general requirement rather than a special
case.
IMHO,
Ran
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Aug 04 2003 - 04:10:04 EDT