[cisco-voip] IPVC3511, does it suck? or is it me

[MIHI]

Hello Avidan,
 
Without an EMP you can't have continuous presence conferences, just voice
activated. 

What do you mean on " the second a 3rd party shows up"? Does the 3rd party
show up in the voice activated way?

Also for VTAs the EMP provides increased display quality because it has
enhanced H.263 codec support. I also recommend to use the latest code on
your MCU, and double check duplex settings.

Marton

________________________________

From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of IT
Sent: Friday, March 17, 2006 11:07 PM
To: Cisco Voip
Subject: [cisco-voip] IPVC3511, does it suck? or is it me



I have an IPVC3511, and I'm using it as an MCU for all my VTA's, so I have
it just set up as a SCCP mcu,

But, its doesn't allow for all the videos to be on screen at once
(continuous presence requires 3511-E they tell me).

When I do create an ad-hoc conference with meet-me, the second a 3rd party
shows up, I get terrible resolution problems, the artifacting is atrocious,
and the video is basically useless.

Does this sound like I have misconfigured the MCU (all 3 callers were on the
same 10/100 network)?

Or, has anyone found that the IPVC is just a rebadge that just isn't ready
for prime time?

 

Thanks,

Avidan