[cisco-voip] T2 or E1?

[David Stanaway]

Heh, that is nuts. Almost as bad as the SunOS version number rolling back
when they start calling it Solaris eg: SunOS 5.4 = Solaris 2.4, but then
SunOS 5.10 = Solaris 10 (Well it is actually probably worse, but for the
fact that Sun perpetuated and altered it). Speaking of T2s, is it possible
that the CT3 hardware can be configured to encapsulate channelized E1s, or
is there some hardware limitation that it can only support T1s. The
difference is in the format of the T2 layer isn't it? I mean there are MUXes
out there where it is just a config switch between channelised T1s and
channelised E1s, and then 1 out of 4 of the T1/E1 ports are disabled.

On 3/20/06, Jim McBurnett <jim at tgasolutions.com> wrote:
>
> All,
> A few days ago I asked a question about a T2 in France.
> I thought I would reply back to that with what I found out.
>
> The France location contacted France Telecom and after speaking to tech
> support:
>
> " A T2 is the name sales refers to our product of an E1 provisioned with
> Voice services."
>
> So the moral of the story is that sales will make some things more
> difficult than they are.
>
> Just when things seemed easier!!
>
> J
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20060321/3be56956/attachment.html