[cisco-voip] H.323 vs MGCP
Matt Slaga (US)
Matt.Slaga at us.didata.com
Tue Aug 19 13:46:20 EDT 2008
Call me old school, but I strongly prefer H323 over MGCraP, unless it is
a PBX to PBX link where thousands of dial peers would be necessary.
From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Matthew
Loraditch
Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2008 1:23 PM
To: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Subject: [cisco-voip] H.323 vs MGCP
All,
In the past I have had MGCP setup for my gateways but recently took over
a system with h.323 for the gateways. The gateways are only connected to
and used by CCM and I like the MGCP abilities to control the various
ports directly in CM. Is there any benefit to keeping them as H.323? If
not is it difficult to convert between one or the other?
Thanks!
Matthew Loraditch
10944 Beaver Dam Road, Suite A
Hunt Valley, Maryland 21030
support at heliontechnologies.com <mailto:support at heliontechnologies.com>
(p) (410) 252-8830
(F) (443) 541-1593
Visit us at www.heliontechnologies.com
<http://www.heliontechnologies.com>
Support Issue? Email support at heliontechnologies.com
<mailto:support at heliontechnologies.com> for fast assistance!
-----------------------------------------
Disclaimer:
This e-mail communication and any attachments may contain
confidential and privileged information and is for use by the
designated addressee(s) named above only. If you are not the
intended addressee, you are hereby notified that you have received
this communication in error and that any use or reproduction of
this email or its contents is strictly prohibited and may be
unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please
notify us immediately by replying to this message and deleting it
from your computer. Thank you.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20080819/39c1a920/attachment.html>
More information about the cisco-voip
mailing list