[cisco-voip] H.323 vs MGCP

[Ryan West]

If it were SRST, the H323 gateway will preserve the call in a WAN failure for somewhere between 3 - 5 mins.  Digit manipulation and call restrictions based on ANI are other reasons I can think of as well.

-ryan

From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Matthew Loraditch
Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2008 1:23 PM
To: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Subject: [cisco-voip] H.323 vs MGCP

All,
In the past I have had MGCP setup for my gateways but recently took over a system with h.323 for the gateways. The gateways are only connected to and used by CCM and I like the MGCP abilities to control the various ports directly in CM. Is there any benefit to keeping them as H.323? If not is it difficult to convert between one or the other?
Thanks!


Matthew Loraditch
10944 Beaver Dam Road, Suite A
Hunt Valley, Maryland  21030
support at heliontechnologies.com<mailto:support at heliontechnologies.com>
(p) (410) 252-8830
(F) (443) 541-1593

Visit us at www.heliontechnologies.com<http://www.heliontechnologies.com>
Support Issue? Email support at heliontechnologies.com<mailto:support at heliontechnologies.com> for fast assistance!

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20080819/beab9b86/attachment-0001.html>