[cisco-voip] H.323 vs MGCP

[Joe Cisco]

I don't know what type of connections or VWICs you have, but quite
commonly we'll do a split config, setting up FXS cards as MGCP, and
then configure the FXO card as h323. You get the caller ID benefit on
the FXO, and the simplicity of configuration in MGCP for the FXS.

-Joe C.

On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 12:23 PM, Matthew Loraditch
<MLoraditch at heliontechnologies.com> wrote:
> All,
>
> In the past I have had MGCP setup for my gateways but recently took over a
> system with h.323 for the gateways. The gateways are only connected to and
> used by CCM and I like the MGCP abilities to control the various ports
> directly in CM. Is there any benefit to keeping them as H.323? If not is it
> difficult to convert between one or the other?
>
> Thanks!
>
>
>
>
>
> Matthew Loraditch
> 10944 Beaver Dam Road, Suite A
> Hunt Valley, Maryland  21030
> support at heliontechnologies.com
> (p) (410) 252-8830
> (F) (443) 541-1593
>
> Visit us at www.heliontechnologies.com
> Support Issue? Email support at heliontechnologies.com for fast assistance!
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
>