-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
We use the Agilent RouterTester equipment and an internet mix of test
traffic in the following ratios:
Packet Size % of Traffic
- -------------------------------
28 1.2
40 35.5
44 2.0
52 3.5
552 0.8
576 11.5
628 1.0
1420 3.0
1500 10.0
40-80 10.8
80-576 11.8
576-1500 6.9
This usually will give us an accurate idea of what actual performance
of the linecard will be.
hope this helps
- --
William R. Charnock
Director Core Technology
Allegiance Telecom, Inc.
469.259.2260 (V)
469.259.9079 (F)
- ----- Original Message -----
From: "Mark Pace Balzan" <mpb@melitacable.com>
To: "Hank Nussbacher" <hank@att.net.il>; <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>
Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2002 1:33 PM
Subject: RE: [nsp] GSR GigaE pps
>
> Hi,
>
> May I ask how people on the list are actually doing stress testing
> on cisco routers and switches to discover the real vs advertised
> capacity and performance.
>
> Im in the process of evaluating performance of various
> switches/routers, and I'd like to know how you are all doing this
> and measuring such values as realistic.
>
>
> Thanks for your time
>
>
> Mark
>
>
>
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Hank Nussbacher [mailto:hank@att.net.il]
> > Sent: 28 February 2002 20:01
> > To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
> > Subject: [nsp] GSR GigaE pps
> >
> >
> > I know that a GigaE interface on a 7500, even with a VIP4-80 will
> > top out at 200kpps. Has anyone done benchmarks on GSR GigaE
> > interfaces? What is the top value you have seen on the following
> > cards:
> >
> > Engine 1: 1-Port GE w/ ECC
> > Engine 2: 3-Port GE
> > Engine 4: 10-Port GE
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Hank
> >
> >
> >
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGPfreeware 7.0.3 for non-commercial use <http://www.pgp.com>
iQA/AwUBPH6nz77O0T/y2UiwEQJcggCfbmsieEFqhoh7VUqHCys+qp+CswQAn0mW
GMOPdu2pAznSnlWFr2kK5hHH
=x+uf
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Aug 04 2002 - 04:13:34 EDT