SHOCK NEWS: Cisco not RFC-1812 compliant

From: Martin Cooper (mjc@cooper.org.uk)
Date: Mon Jan 10 2000 - 13:57:03 EST


Today I learned the shocking truth: the Cisco 800 series is not
compliant with RFC-1812 ("Requirements for IP Version 4 Routers").

1812 says the following:

  "A router that implements any routing protocol (other than static
   routes) MUST IMPLEMENT OSPF (see Section [7.2.2]). A router MAY
   implement additional IGPs."

The 800 series supports RIP, so by this requirement it should also
support OSPF. I know the 800 series is a toy router, and I wouldn't
much care about OSPF support if it wasn't an RFC requirement, but
really, I would have liked to think that a company with as long a
history as Cisco would be able to manage to properly implement the
requirements of such a fundamental RFC. Apparently not... :-(

Is the ignorance of fundamental RFC requirements going to be
spreading to other products in the Cisco range I have to ask?

M.



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Aug 04 2002 - 04:12:08 EDT