At 04:22 PM 07/27/2000 -0300, Loureiro, Rodrigo wrote:
>OK. Let´s confirm your theory:
>
> _____ ____
> | | IBGP | |
> | R1 |--------| R4 |
> |_____| |____|
> |RR
> |
> |
> __|Client
> | |
> | R2 |
> |_____|
> |RR
> |
> |
> __|Client
> | |
> | R3 |
> |_____|
>
>
>If R2 is a RR client peering with R1, and R3 is a RR client peering with R2,
>R3 advertisements will be forwarded by R2 to R1 and then to R4 (non-client
>peer), and R4 advertisements will be forwarded to R2 by R1 and then to R3,
>am i correct?
>I just want to know if the protocol has this scalability, regardless of the
>next-hop issues.
yes it will work like this
Zaheer
>
>
>Thanks,
>--
>
>Rodrigo Loureiro
>
>
>
>-----Mensagem original-----
>De: Martin, Christian [mailto:CMartin@mercury.balink.com]
>Enviada em: quinta-feira, 27 de julho de 2000 15:45
>Para: 'Loureiro, Rodrigo'; cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
>Assunto: RE: [nsp] A BGP RR question
>
>
>RRs can be RR clients to other RRs in the RR hierarchy. Just be careful of
>how you build your tree, as loops are possible under certain configurations.
>Your RR tree should attempt to mirror you virtual L3 topology. RR clients
>should never peer with a RR through another RR, as loops can form.
>
>HTH,
>chris
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Loureiro, Rodrigo [mailto:rodrigo.loureiro@netstream.com.br]
>Sent: Thursday, July 27, 2000 2:27 PM
>To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
>Subject: [nsp] A BGP RR question
>
>
>Hi all,
>
>Has anyone tried to run two instances of BGP RR on the same router, one
>peering as a route reflector and the other as a route reflector client?
>
>
>
>Regards,
>--
>
>Rodrigo Loureiro
>Network Engineer - Netstream Telecom
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Aug 04 2002 - 04:12:14 EDT