RE: [nsp] Copper T1 Termination on GSR/ESR

From: Martin, Christian (cmartin@gnilink.net)
Date: Thu Jan 11 2001 - 21:28:08 EST


> On Thu, Jan 11, 2001 at 07:52:49PM -0500, Martin, Christian wrote:
> > Has anyone heard any rumors on whether or not Cisco will be
> building copper
> > T1 boards for the GSR/ESRs? If not, I need to start
> looking at M13 muxes,
> > and would appreciate any recommendations you may have for
> such gear. I need
> > something carrier grade (obviously) with SNMP support and a
> decent CLI.
> > Something sans TL1 would be very nice, but not necessary.
>
> Why not use a channelized DS3? If you can afford a GSR, you can
> probably afford DS3 loop (and in most cases once you get beyond a few
> T1s the loop is cheaper.)

In most cases we will. However, in some areas, we sell more fast packet
services to customers (ATM, Frame), and have many legacy copper T1s. As
some of you may know, the blizzard card (6CT3-SMB) lists at $165,000, second
only to the as yet unreleased OC192 cards. I'd like to phase out my 75xxs
altogether eventually, however, T1 loops will continue to sell. Any
recommendations on a M13 Mux?

thx,
chris

>
> Alternatively, you can use a 3:1 MUX.
>
> Before anyone says it, yes, I realize that DS3s are not
> available
> in some rural areas, but I also realize that such areas
> generally do not
> require GSRs or equivalent performance level devices.
>
> --msa
>



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Aug 04 2002 - 04:12:25 EDT