Re: NAT using only a real interface?

From: C. Jon Larsen (jlarsen@richweb.com)
Date: Wed Jan 17 2001 - 21:54:08 EST


Move the public address to your serial (WAN) interface, and place the
inside RFC1918 (private) address on the eth interface. Setup pat (nat
overload) on that one public IP you have. Works very well, done it many
times with ISDN, frame, ppp, and atm circuits. Its like Easy IP, only with
a static IP on the interface that has ip nat outside.

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

my $info = {

c jon larsen => 'richweb.com',
email: => 'jlarsen@richweb.com',
wireless: => '+804.307.6939',

};

PGP Key fingerprint: 8A 62 4C 6E 1E 3C CD 63 B3 16 1A 1B D2 61 EE 97
PGP Public key available at: http://richweb.com/cjl.txt

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

On Wed, 17 Jan 2001, Andrew wrote:

> Are you asking if you can have a PRIMARY address of 123.123.123.1/24 on E0
> and THEN put a secondary address of 192.168.1.0/24 on the SAME interface
> and THEN NAT between the two? If that is your question then no (and WHY?)
>
> If you are asking if IP address 'A' can be placed on ethernet interface '0'
> and then IP address 'B' placed on ethernet interface '1' and then NAT
> between the two then YES.
>
> If you need documentation on how:
>
> http://www.cisco.com and search for 'Network Address Translation' in the
> Technical Documents area.
>
> -A
>
> At 07:34 PM 1/17/01 -0500, Salvatore Privitera wrote:
> >HI all,
> >
> >We have Cisco 2600 connected to internet using public IP 123.123.123.1/24
> >address on the eth0/0 port.
> >
> >Is possible, using only that ethernet port, create a intranet LAN using
> >192.168.1.0/24 space and natting on o the ethernet interface? How I set ip
> >nat inside/ ip nat outside setting? I need to create loopback or null
> >interface to do so?
> >
> >.salvo
>



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Aug 04 2002 - 04:12:25 EDT