I would say that depends on Platforms.
In New one like 28948gl3 , It will give precedence to Routing updates and
drop the Packets with Lower Precedence.
Thanks
Yogi
At 08:24 PM 5/18/2001 +0100, Kevin Gannon wrote:
>For priority queuing it does have an affect so I can not see why
>CAR would be any different.
>
>Regards,
>Kevin
>
>>Hello guys and gals,
>>
>>I have rather interesting question. If I have a rate-limit *without* access
>>list applied to the interface, e.g.
>>
>>int TypeX/Y/Z
>>rate-limit input <rate> <burst> etc.
>>
>>would this statement affect routing updates sent and received via this
>>interface? Routing protocols of particular interest are OSPF, eBGP, iBGP and
>>multihop eBGP. Probably IS-IS, too. ;)
>>
>>Authoritatvive answer is much appreciated. ;)
>>
>>P.S. "Affect" in my context would be "would this rate-limit statement in any
>>way interfere with the flow of routing packets, even if they are contribute
>>to the traffic exceeding <rate> limitation?"
>>
>>SY,
>>--
>> CCNP, CCDP (R&S) Dmitri E. Kalintsev
>> CDPlayer@irc Network Architect @ connect.com.au
>> dek @ connect.com.au phone: +61 39 674 3913 fax: 251 3666
>> http://-UNAVAIL- UIN:7150410 cell: +61 41 335 1634
>
>*********************************IMPORTANT
>NOTICE******************************
>All e-mails for technical support must be cc'd to support@lancomms.ie. This
>ensures that the call is logged with the support desk and the case is actively
>tracked which speeds up the response you will receive. If you have an urgent
>problem you _must_ contact the support desk directly on 01-4093030.
>*****************************************************************************************
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Aug 04 2002 - 04:12:38 EDT