On Fri, May 18, 2001 at 04:20:36PM -0700, Yogeshwaran Raghunathan wrote:
> I would say that depends on Platforms.
>
> In New one like 28948gl3 , It will give precedence to Routing updates and
> drop the Packets with Lower Precedence.
2948G-L3 you meant? :)
Platforms in question are 7500 and 7200. Configuration command that worries
me is this or alike:
int type x/y/z
rate-limit input <rate> <burst> <burst> conform-action set-prec-transmit 0
exceed-action set-prec-transmit 0
which guys here used to use (and it's widely deployed) to get rid of any
preferential treatment for any kind of traffic. So, now I understand that
routing updates *will* be matched by this statement, but then another
question remanis:
If my interface has "Queueing strategy: VIP-based fair queuing", does it
give any preferential treatment to routing updates when they have original
precedence of 6?
SY,
-- CCNP, CCDP (R&S) Dmitri E. Kalintsev CDPlayer@irc Network Architect @ connect.com.au dek @ connect.com.au phone: +61 39 674 3913 fax: 251 3666 http://-UNAVAIL- UIN:7150410 cell: +61 41 335 1634
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Aug 04 2002 - 04:12:38 EDT