At present I am experimenting with running 2 OSPF processes (on a Cisco)
and redistributing routes between the 2 processes. This way you can then
use the summary-address commands to aggragate the routes.
Unfortunately, it doesn't work 100% yet...
Matt.
On 03-Aug-98 Jon Lewis wrote:
> On Mon, 3 Aug 1998, brad wrote:
>
>> It would seem that you alluded to this idea with your
>> area 1/area 0. However, it was my impression that summary address
>> should be used when you are injecting routes from bgp or somesuch
>> into ospf. When moving between ospf areas, range seemed suited
>> to the aggregation task.
>
> Neither summary-address nor the area range commands seem to apply to my
> case. At least neither works for what I want to happen.
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Aug 04 2002 - 04:13:13 EDT