Hi Bala,
Sorry for the late response, I miss-filed your mail for a response,
See comments inline.
Gary
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Bala Subrahmanyam Venkata [mailto:bsubrahm@doradosoftware.com]
>Sent: 09 October 2001 00:47
>To: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
>Subject: Re: [j-nsp] Extranet in MPLS VPNs
>
>
>Gary-
>
>Two questions based on your response based on the 'Overlapping
>VPNs' doc
>that you had sent (thx. It is very informative).
>
>1. Per your doc the CE2 Router is in VPN A and VPN B. What if there is
>another CE Router (say 'CE6' Router) that is directly
>connected to the same
>PE Router (PE1 in your case) and it(CE6) is also part of VPN A
>and B ? Will
>its VRF be similar to that of VPNAB ?
I believe in this case I would simply add the interface for CE6 into the
VRF, VPNAB and add the additional routes required for this new site.
>2. On the same lines, what if CE6 instead is part of VPN A and
>some other VPN C ? How will this affect the configuration ?
>
In this case you would have to create another VRF for VPN-AC with the
appropriate RIB-Groups.
>Before you could research further, are these two cases 'real world' ?
>
With extranets I believe anything could be asked for.
>
>TIA
>
>bala
>
>
>P.S. A comment on the doc. Calling the sites as "VPNA", "VPNB"
>and "VPNAB"
>is confusing. Perhaps you can choose a better name that describes the
>scenario ?
I will send this on the appropriate people internally. Do you have any
suggestions for names?
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Aug 05 2002 - 10:42:37 EDT