Re: [j-nsp] Cisco equivilant to an M5?

From: Nicolas FEVRIER (nicolas.fevrier@free.fr)
Date: Thu Dec 06 2001 - 17:21:20 EST

Next message: Joseph Lin: "RE: [j-nsp] Cisco equivilant to an M5?"
Previous message: Andy Harding: "RE: [j-nsp] Cisco equivilant to an M5?"
In reply to: William R. Charnock: "Re: [j-nsp] Cisco equivilant to an M5?"
Next in thread: Chris Watson: "Re: [j-nsp] Cisco equivilant to an M5?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

> I'm curious why the M5 would be better than an M10? Twice the port density
> at a minimum upgrade cost...
>
> Just my .02

M10 supports STM-16 pic, M5 doesn't. That could make the difference.

Nicolas.

Next message: Joseph Lin: "RE: [j-nsp] Cisco equivilant to an M5?"
Previous message: Andy Harding: "RE: [j-nsp] Cisco equivilant to an M5?"
In reply to: William R. Charnock: "Re: [j-nsp] Cisco equivilant to an M5?"
Next in thread: Chris Watson: "Re: [j-nsp] Cisco equivilant to an M5?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Aug 05 2002 - 10:42:38 EDT