RE: [j-nsp] Cisco equivilant to an M5?

From: Guy Davies (Guy.Davies@telindus.co.uk)
Date: Fri Dec 07 2001 - 04:43:51 EST


 
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Sorry folks, I made a slight mistake in that the 4 port quad wide GE
SX card is only available for the M5/M10 and not for the M20/M40.

Regards,

Guy

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Niels Bakker [mailto:niels=juniper-nsp@bakker.net]
> Sent: Friday, December 07, 2001 2:03 AM
> To: Andy Harding
> Cc: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
> Subject: Re: [j-nsp] Cisco equivilant to an M5?
>
>
> * andyh@verio.net (Andy Harding) [Thu 06 Dec 2001, 23:15 CET]:
> >> The M5 can be stuffed with 48 of them you'll still be able to
> >> run them all at full capacity.
> > this card over-subscribes the backplane - juniper themselves
> > readily admit this
> >
> > you can't run all these ports full-rate
>
> Good point. I should've done the math myself, too...
>
> Are they making a two-port GigE PIC yet? Those are handy in
> redundant setups, where you use either one of them at any time.
> Doesn't seem like
> it - my employer at that time going bankrupt probably didn't
> add to the
> credibility of the request. :-)
>
> Cheers,
>
>
> -- Niels.
>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP 7.0.1

iQA/AwUBPBCPQI3dwu/Ss2PCEQJhXwCgwHvHK5E+TVkP20TqR9Thz1MWSP4AoNrn
nbvNhgRxuXTGtNLrRai2GNet
=ryuP
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

.



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Aug 05 2002 - 10:42:38 EDT