Can you elaborate more on this because (correct me if I am wrong) is MBGP a requirement for MSDP? If not then only a simply BGP session is needed. Even if you use MBGP, routes received from a peer are placed into a routing table based on the SAFI and even in inet.0 and inet.2 you would still get normal Juniper BGP behavior meaning that the same BGP default policy applies to the 2 tables. So how is it that MSDP requires MBGP to poison routes received from a peer in a neighbor AS if the same default policy applies when the routes are received from a peer? Just trying to understand.
JunoGuy
--
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Aug 05 2002 - 10:42:39 EDT