>From: MPuras@solunet.com
>To: junosguy@hotmail.com
>Subject: RE: [j-nsp] VRF interface ping problem
>Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2002 15:30:39 -0500
>
>Speaking on the Juniper, Once the sonet interface between the CE and the PE
>is established as a VRF instance that interface now belongs to the VRF
>table
>and not inet.0. So inet.0 will not have routing knowledge of that
>interface.
Yeah, sure. But at least, A regular ping should be ok from CE side, as VPN
should be transparent to Customer. And my problem is if i included the
interface in the VRF, PE and CE will lose their IP connection at all in my
case.
So I'm wondering if there's sth wrong related with the Layer2 connection
between Juniper and Cisco?
>
>
>Thanks,
>
>
>Mario Puras
>
>JNCIS, CCNA, LSCP, MCP
>SoluNet Technical Support
>Customer Support Engineer
>* Mailto: mpuras@solunet.com
>* 888.449.5766 (USA) / 888.SOLUNET (Canada)
>
>
>
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: David Liang [mailto:junosguy@hotmail.com]
>Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2002 2:54 PM
>To: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
>Subject: [j-nsp] VRF interface ping problem
>
>
>Hi, All
>
>A simple quesition about VPN PE-CE connection, the Topology like that:
>
> sonet/cisco-hdlc or PPP
> Junos-----------------------------IOS
> vpn/PE CE
>
>I'm sure the ports are pingable at first, but after adding the sonet port
>to
>
>junos VRF, the ping from CE will be failed. From the IOS side, it seems It
>can't find the juniper port's ARP at all. So is there additional
>configuration for both sides?
>
>Thanks! -David
>
>_________________________________________________________________
>Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: http://mobile.msn.com
_________________________________________________________________
Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: http://mobile.msn.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Aug 05 2002 - 10:42:39 EDT