I have M20s running 4.2R1.3-export and M20s running 4.2R2.4-Domestic.
Fernando
> -----Original Message-----
> From: MarcoH [mailto:marcoh@cistron.nl]
> Sent: segunda-feira, 12 de março de 2001 13:32
> To: Fernando Krahe
> Cc: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
> Subject: Re: problem with pos-interface sdh-framing
>
>
> On Mon, Mar 12, 2001 at 11:15:42AM -0300, Fernando Krahe wrote:
> > Marco,
> >
> > we have some OC-3s on M20s and they are all running on SDH
> mode and have
> > cisco and Riverstone routers on the other end. They are all
> working fine,
> > although the Riverstone had some problems negotiating the
> PPP MTU. The cisco
> > works just fine, both 12Ks and 7513s.
>
> Should have mentioned it in my first posting, but what
> software version
> are you running ?? I`m currently at 4.3R1.4.
>
> Grtx,
>
> MarcoH
>
> --
> Reality is an obstacle to hallucination.
>
From hank@att.net.il¢óÅ;e
Received: from someone claiming to be
biff.att.net.il (biff.att.net.il [192.115.72.164])
by puck.n¢óÅ;r.
for <juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Tue, 13 Mar 2001 01:27:38 -0500
(envelo¢óÅ;ro
Received-Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2001 01:27:38 -0500
Received: from docking.att.net.il (hank.tlv.att.net.il [¢óÅ;11
by biff.att.net.il (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6615100D
for <juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Tue, 13 Mar 2001 08:03:¢óÅ;02
Message-Id: <4.3.2.7.2.20010313082456.00abe760@max.ibm.net.il>
X-Sender: hank@max.ibm.net.il
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM W¢óÅ;ws
Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2001 08:26:20 +0200
To: <juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net>
From: Hank N
MIme-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format
I know that Juniper now has 30%+ of the core router market. My question is
do people use Junipers at public a¢óÅ;ri
it still 100% Cisco 7500s?
Thanks,
Hank
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Aug 05 2002 - 10:42:40 EDT