[j-nsp] IPSec performance benchmarks for M40 and M160

From: RJ Hwang (EUD) (RJ.Hwang@am1.ericsson.se)
Date: Thu May 24 2001 - 13:05:14 EDT

Next message: Stacy W. Smith: "RE: [j-nsp] ISIS metric question"
Previous message: Pegg Damon: "RE: [j-nsp] ISIS metric question"
Next in thread: Attneave, Philip: "RE: [j-nsp] IPSec performance benchmarks for M40 and M160"
Maybe reply: Attneave, Philip: "RE: [j-nsp] IPSec performance benchmarks for M40 and M160"
Maybe reply: Steve Holman: "RE: [j-nsp] IPSec performance benchmarks for M40 and M160"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

Hi -- Quick question regarding 'turning on the IPSec encryption' I have read in some articles that this can reduce the throughput of routers (not necessarily Juniper) by as much as 1-2 orders magnitude (i.e., 10x-100x reduction). Does anyone has test result of IPSec performance benchmarks for M40 and M160 by using small packets and large packets.

Thanks

Next message: Stacy W. Smith: "RE: [j-nsp] ISIS metric question"
Previous message: Pegg Damon: "RE: [j-nsp] ISIS metric question"
Next in thread: Attneave, Philip: "RE: [j-nsp] IPSec performance benchmarks for M40 and M160"
Maybe reply: Attneave, Philip: "RE: [j-nsp] IPSec performance benchmarks for M40 and M160"
Maybe reply: Steve Holman: "RE: [j-nsp] IPSec performance benchmarks for M40 and M160"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Aug 05 2002 - 10:42:42 EDT