The PCs have multiple serial and ethernet ports. When I attended the
course a few months ago the lab was about half Mxx junipers and
half olives (PCs). The only differences between the olives and the
Mxx routers is (1)the fxp0/fxp1 stuff -- these have specific functions
on the Mxx's, but are normal FEs on the olives, and (2) you can't see
a bunch of the show chassi stuff on the olives.
I understand that the olives in the lab were a short term, limited budget,
physically light weight, solution. I belive they're retiring them in favor
of Mxx's now.
-sara
On Thu, Oct 19, 2000 at 03:09:10PM -0700, Paulo Pereira wrote:
> Hi,
>
> the labs are done on PC's ?
>
> But, this away you don't the change to configure stuff
> with real traffic...
>
> Or does the PCs have lots of ?ethernet? interfaces?
>
> How do you do a internetwork ?
>
> PP
>
> --- Rene Avi <rene.avi@kpnqwest.com> wrote:
> > At 22:38 13/10/2000 -0500, Rob Thomas wrote:
> > >Hello, listfolk.
> > >
> > >Has anyone recently attended the ever-full Juniper
> > courses, e.g. the
> > >three or five day course bundle? If so, I would
> > like to hear your
> > >impressions of the course.
> >
> > I had the pleasure to attend the 5 days juniper
> > course in europe. It´s focused
> > on the hw/sw-design and most important the look &
> > feel of those boxes.
> > The course - as well as the product - is built for
> > service providers so you
> > should bring along a clear understanding of the
> > protocols and techniques
> > used in
> > this enviroment (BGP, OSPF, IS-IS, Multicast), don´t
> > expect explanations
> > on that during the course. The funny part is the
> > labs are on ordinary PCs
> > running JunOS, which makes it kind of cheap to built
> > your own lab.
> >
> > Basicly it´s where you find the IOS-feature on JunOS
> > + configuration labs.
> > I recommend it for a start into JuniperLand :-)
> >
> > Cheers,
> > /rene
> >
> > --
> > / Rene Avi <Rene.Avi@KPNQwest.com> | Phone: +43 1
> > 89933 0 Fax 533 \
> > \ KPNQwest Engineering&Technical Ops| Diefenbachg.
> > 35 A-1150 Wien /
> >
>
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Yahoo! Messenger - Talk while you surf! It's FREE.
> http://im.yahoo.com/
From jared@puck.neth¦óÅ;et
Received: (from jared@localhost)
by puck.nether.net (8.11.1/8.9.3) id f54I7aJ04677
for junipe¦óÅ;p@localhost1/8.9.3) idI
(envelope-from jared)
Resent-Message-Id: <200106041807.f54I7aJ04677@puck.¦óÅ;er
REceived: (from slist@localhost)
by puck.nether.net (8.11.1/8.9.3) id f51I9r804407;
Fri, 1 Jun 2001 14:09:53 -0400¦óÅ;nv
Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2001 14:09:53 -0400
X-From_: serge@netvmg.com Fri Jun 1¦óÅ;09
Received: from someone claiming to be
pefw00.ivmg.net (mail.ivmg.net [64.209.84.66])
by puck.nether.net (8.11.¦óÅ;9.
for <juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Fri, 1 Jun 2001 14:09:52 -0400
(envelope-from serge@net¦óÅ;co
ReceIved-Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2001 14:09:52 -0400
Received: from pimx00.ivmg.net (pimx00.ivmg.net [192.168.0.10])
by pefw0¦óÅ;mg
Fri, 1 Jun 2001 18:09:51 GMT
Received: (from serge@localhost)
by pimx00¦óÅ;g.
Fri, 1 Jun 2001 11:09:50 -0700
Old-Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2001 11:09:50 -0700
From: Serge Maskalik ¦óÅ;ge
To: Pegg Damon <Damon.Pegg@carrier1.com>
Cc: "'Jay Burns'" <jayburns66@hotmail.com>, juniper-nsp@puck.nether.¦óÅ;Su
Message-ID: <20010601110950.L2459@ivmg.net>
References: <83189BAB0F57D411A1C400508ZéÅ;DB
X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0.1i
In-Reply-To: <8318¦óÅ;0F
X-Diagnos¦óÅ; N
X-Envelope-To: juniper-nsp
Resent-From: jared@puck.nether.net
Resent-Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2001 14:07:36 ¦óÅ;0
Not true - IOS IS-IS implementation *only* uses the
default metric of 1¦óÅ; t
is not configured on an interface. The loopback is
should be introduced as a passive i¦óÅ;fa
have a null metric. See below:
-----
BR1.C11-0.SJC#sh isis database detail verbose
IS-IS Level-2 Link ZéÅ;e
LSPID
CR1.C11-0.SJC.00-00 0x00000022 0x¦óÅ;
Auth: Length: 8
Area Address: 49.0000
NLPID: 0xCC
Hostname: CR1.C11-0.¦óÅ;
Metric: 50 IS-Extended CR1.C11-0.SJC.02
Metric: 50 IS-Extended CR1.C11-0.SJC¦óÅ;
Metric: 50 IP 10.10.10.0/25
Metric: 50 IP 172.16.0.144¦óÅ;
Metric: 0 IP 172.16.1.20/32 <---- loopback0 int
Same is tr¦óÅ;or
-----
serge@BR2.C11-0.SJC> show isis database detail
IS-IS level 1 link-state database:
BR2.C11-0.SJC.00-00ZéÅ;qu
BR2.C11-0.SJC.00-00 Sequence: 0x¦óÅ;Ch
IS neighbor: CR1.C11-0.SJC.02 Metric: 10
IS neighbor: ZéÅ;
IP prefix: ¦óÅ;
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
¦óÅ;
IP prefix: 10.10.10.0/25 Metric: 10 Internal
- Serge
Thu¦óÅ;ak
> The Cisco default metric is 10, and although you can argue whether or not
> thi¦óÅ; r
> do say 'sh ip ro' for a hostname who's dns entry is t¦óÅ;oo
> then you get 10 added to the actual metric to reach the box. As far as I
> can tell this is the same on¦óÅ;ip
> a loopback as source for load-balancing two or more circuits you may want to
> explicitly zero the loopback metric.
>
> damon.
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Jay Burns [mailto:jayburns66@hotmail.com]
> > Sent: 24 May 2001 02:25
> > To: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
> > Subject: [j-nsp] ISIS metric question
> >
> >
> > I notice if I use a Juniper for a given network node and
> > configure the net
> > address for an ISIS instance on the loopback, a metric 10 is
> > added to path
> > costs above that if I used a Cisco for the same node. Why
> > would you want to
> > add a cost to the loopback as if the router resides off the loopback?
> >
> > -Jay
> > _________________________________________________________________
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Aug 05 2002 - 10:42:42 EDT